• Atlanta Catholic Business Conference Registration
  • Books from ICL’s Contributing Writers
  • Faith Resources
    • Bible Studies
      • Explorations in the Gospel of John
    • Deacon Mike Bickerstaff
      • Workplace Virtue and Ethics
    • Explorations in the Preaching of St. Paul
    • Leadership Qualities of Pope Francis
    • Living an Integrated Catholic Life
      • Randy Hain
    • Resources – Defending the Faith
    • Resources – Prayer and Spirituality
      • Dr. Michael Naughton
      • Father Jacques Philippe
      • Sister Regina Marie, O.C.D.
    • The Catholic Faith Explained
      • The Transcendentals
  • Integrated Catholic Life™ Speakers Bureau
    • Andrew Werkheiser
    • Deacon Mike Bickerstaff
    • Fr. Dwight Longenecker
    • Kelly Wahlquist
    • Mark Danis
    • Mary Wallace
    • Mike Carlton
    • Patti Maguire Armstrong
    • Randy Hain
    • Sarah Vabulas
  • Meet ICL’s Editors, Writers, Artists and Photographers
  • Newsletter
  • Prayers
  • Recording of Funeral Rites for Dess Bickerstaff
  • SPC CRHP Men’s Giving Team for 2021
  • Thank You For Your Support!
  • Visitor Maps
Integrated Catholic Life™
  • Home
  • Blogs
    • Deacon Mike Bickerstaff
    • Randy Hain
    • Joannie Watson
  • Catholic Poetry Room
  • Scripture Reflections
  • In the Spotlight
  • Daily Extras

Whose Rights? The Paradox of Moral Relativism

June 18, 2013By Dr. Edward SriFaith & Reason, In the Spotlight, Prolife, Social Doctrine
Creation of Adam (detail) by Michaelangelo

Creation of Adam (detail) by Michaelangelo

Whose rights are protected in a relativistic culture?

It is precisely on this point that relativistic societies face a serious dilemma: How does a community arbitrate various individuals’ competing interests? There is much rhetoric in our modern world about protecting human rights and every individual’s freedom, but what if one person or group wants to do something that is directly opposed to someone else’s values or interests? How does a society decide whose “right” or whose “freedom of choice” will be protected?

Take, for instance, the following moral debates in our own times:

Does a child in the womb have the right to life? Or does a mother have a right to abort her baby? Does a business owner have the right to say publicly that he believes marriage is between one man and one woman? Or does a homosexual person in the community have the right to be protected from such public statements which he or she might consider to be “hate speech”? Do women have the right to receive contraceptives through their health insurance, even if they work for the Catholic Church? Or does the Church have the right to adhere to its moral teachings and not provide contraception to its employees?

How does a relativistic society determine whose freedom of choice will be safeguarded and whose will be limited? In a culture that has no reference to a common good — that has no shared vision about the good life for man — these questions are not resolved in any fair way. They remain constantly up for debate and completely up for grabs. Lobbyists maneuver in Washington. Groups organize to protest. Strategists try to sway public opinion. Compromises are made and some will have to give up more than others. But one thing is clear in the process: not everyone’s “rights” are protected. In the end, the very determination of what a human right is and whose rights are safeguarded is completely arbitrary.


A Mass of Individuals

The relativistic worldview exalts the autonomous self and emphasizes the individual’s freedom to do whatever he wants with his life.  But, as Bl. John Paul II explains, even if the self is promoted in an absolute way, the individual still will run up against others who have different opinions and opposing interests that threaten one’s own pursuits.  And these rival claims are not easily resolved with a relativistic outlook.

Instead of appealing to a common good and a moral standard to which all are accountable, we tend to navigate these situations through self-assertion, manipulation, and power moves.  Instead of viewing our neighbor as someone with whom we are united in striving toward a common goal, we view him as an obstacle to our own desires and way of life.  As such, John Paul wrote in Evangelium Vitae,

“People inevitably reach the point of rejecting one another.  Everyone else is considered an enemy from whom one has to defend oneself.  Thus society becomes a mass of individuals placed side by side, but without any mutual bonds.  Each one wishes to assert himself independently of the other and in fact intends to make his own interest prevail.” (no. 20)

In the face of these competing interests, not everyone’s freedom can be protected.  Some kind of compromise must be made.  “In this way, any reference to common values and to a truth absolutely binding on everyone is lost, and social life ventures on to the shifting sands of complete relativism.”  The Holy Father continues:  “At that point everything is negotiable, everything is open to bargaining:  even the first of the fundamental rights, the right to life” (EV, 20, emphasis added).

Once human rights are up for negotiation, the weaker members of society will find themselves at the mercy of the more powerful.  John Paul points out how when the basic human rights of an unborn child and the elderly, for example, are denied by modern democratic governments, it is a particular set of political rulers or even the majority of people who are making the determination about who receives human rights and who doesn’t.

In this way, the definition of human rights is based not on the good of individual persons or the good of society, but on the interests of those who are in power — whether it be the wealthy, governmental leaders or those who are able to shape public opinion and influence the political process.  “This is the sinister result of a relativism which reigns unopposed:  the ‘right’ ceases to be such, because it is no longer firmly founded on the inviolable dignity of the person, but is made subject to the will of the stronger part.  In this way democracy, contradicting its own principles, effectively moves towards a form of totalitarianism” (no. 20).


Why Make the Sacrifice?

Christian ethicist Stanely Hauerwas raises an important issue along these lines.  People today tend to think they can do whatever they want with their lives and be morally good persons as long as they don’t hurt or limit other people’s choices.  But Hauerwas notes how this is a grand illusion rooted in the individualism of our times — an individualism that forgets how intertwined our lives really are.  Because human persons are united together in solidarity, all forms of morality require us to make sacrifices for others in some way or another.  Hauerwas explains, “Insofar as we are people who care about anything at all, we necessarily impinge on the ‘freedom’ of others.  But we act as if we do not, thus hiding from ourselves and others the truth that we are necessarily tied together in a manner that mutually limits our lives.”

He goes on:

“In fact, however, there is no morality that does not require others to suffer for our commitments.  But there is nothing wrong with asking others to share and sacrifice for what we believe to be worthy.  A more appropriate concern is whether what we commit ourselves to is worthy or not.”  (The Peaceable Kingdom, p. 9 emphasis added)

This is the crucial issue.  There is nothing wrong in asking people to make sacrifices for a worthy cause.  But is it the Christian or the relativistic worldview that gives a better account for why one should suffer for the sake of others?

In both perspectives, individuals will not always be able to do whatever they want in life.  In both outlooks, people will run up against others who will limit their freedom.  The question is which worldview offers a good reason to make sacrifices for others?

In the relativistic worldview, the limitation of one’s freedom is not based on what is good for society, what is good for others, or what is good for the individual involved.  You are asked to limit your freedom simply because someone else asserted their will over yours — whether it be a stronger-willed family member, a bigger corporation, a set of political rulers, or even the majority in your society that voted against your values and interests.  The curb on your freedom is not related to you flourishing more as a human person or to what is best for your community; rather it is based on someone else’s own selfish interests.  And that’s not a convincing reason for you to limit your freedom!

Self-Fulfillment in Self-Giving

The Catholic perspective, however, puts the call to limit one’s freedom in a wider context of human flourishing.  God made us to live for others, and when we offer our lives as a gift to others, we discover the deeper meaning of our lives.

No doubt, sacrificial love requires certain limitations on one’s freedom.  We deny ourselves in order to serve someone else’s good.  But this limitation is not viewed as something negative.  When we give ourselves in service to others, we find a deeper fulfillment in life because we are living the way God made us.  When, for example, a man gives liberally to the poor, he realizes a deeper fulfillment in life as he grows in sacrificial generosity.  The sacrifice is not just good for the poor people he serves; it is good for him as well.

Similarly, when a woman serves her newborn baby and experiences chronic sleep deprivation for several months, she also discovers a deeper fulfillment in life as she lives her vocation as a mother growing in self-giving love.  Her dying to herself is not just a blessing for her newborn; it is a blessing to her as well.  In the Catholic view, sacrifices are not merely limiting.  They enrich one’s life and conform us more to Christ Himself.  As Vatican II put it, “Man finds himself when he makes his life a sincere gift to others.”


Acknowledgement

Reprinted with permission from the November/December 2012 issue of Lay Witness magazine. © 2012 Catholics United for the Faith / www.cuf.org/Laywitness/index.asp

Dr. Sri’s latest book is A Biblical Walk through the Mass.


If you liked this article, please share it with your friends and family using the Share and Recommend buttons below and via email. We value your comments and encourage you to leave your thoughts below. Thank you! – The Editors

Print this entry

About the Author

Dr. Edward Sri is a nationally-known Catholic speaker who appears regularly on EWTN and is the author of several Catholic best selling books, including The New Rosary in Scripture: Biblical Insights for Praying the 20 Mysteries (Servant) and Men, Women and the Mystery of Love: Practical Insights on John Paul II’s Love and Responsibility (Servant).

Among his recent books are Walking with Mary: A Biblical Journey from Nazareth to the Cross (Image), A Biblical Walk through the Mass (Ascension Press), The Bible Compass: A Catholic’s Guide to Navigating the Scriptures (Ascension Press) and The Gospel of Matthew (Baker Academic).

Edward is a founding leader with Curtis Martin of FOCUS (Fellowship of Catholic University Students), and he currently serves as the provost and professor of theology and Scripture at the Augustine Institute Master’s program in Denver, Colorado. He also teaches as a visiting professor at Benedictine College, where he taught full-time for nine years. Edward holds a doctorate from the Pontifical University of St. Thomas Aquinas in Rome. He resides with his wife Elizabeth and their five children in Littleton, Colorado.

Other books by Edward Sri include: Mystery of the Kingdom: On the Gospel of Matthew (Emmaus Road), Queen Mother: A Biblical Theology of Mary’s Queenship (Emmaus Road); Dawn of the Messiah: The Coming of Christ in Scripture (Servant) and The Da Vinci Deception: 100 Questions About the Facts and Fiction of The Da Vinci Code (Ascension Press; coauthored with Mark Shea). He also is a contributor to the popular apologetics series, Catholic for a Reason and a recent volume on Catholic Marian theology called Mariology (Queenship Publishing).

Connect with Dr. Sri on:

Author Archive Page

You May Also Enjoy

Faith & Reason, In the Spotlight, Prolife, Social DoctrineCulture of Life, featured, human dignity, moral relativism, pro-life, rights
Daily Catholic Quote from the United States Catholic Bishops on Economic Justice
Daily Catholic Quote from St. Augustine, Doctor of the Church

Our Editors

Deacon Michael Bickerstaff, Editor in chief

Randy Hain, Senior Editor

Joannie Watson, Associate Editor

Jeffrey Essmann, Poetry Editor and Curator

Tim Bete, Poetry Editor Emeritus

Help us spread the Word. Invite family and friends to visit us! Like ICL on Facebook, follow ICL on Twitter, connect with us on Google+ and subscribe to our feeds via RSS.

Like our Facebook Page

Featured Content

Article Archive

Category Specific RSS

  • All Topics
  • Into the Deep by Deacon Bickerstaff
  • Surrender and Strength by Randy Hain
  • Between the Sundays with Joannie Watson
  • Prayer and the Bible with Mark Danis
  • Catholic Poetry Room with Tim Bete

Recent Articles

  • We Shouldn’t Be Afraid to Talk about Hell
  • Why Do We Follow a Secular Compass?
  • In the Garden
  • The Winning Strategy
  • The Power of Humility
  • Love, Suffering and the Transfiguration
  • Station Churches and Lenten Pilgrimage
  • Powerful Lessons from St. Joseph
  • Lonely Shades of Light
  • Practical Lessons for Lent
  • The ‘Both And’ of Lent
  • Living Simply This Lent
  • The Roar of Waters
  • Forty Ideas for Your Lent
  • Dr. Scott Hahn: Made Clean
  • When You’ve Lost that Lenten Feelin’
  • The Clarity of Simon Peter’s Example
  • What Do You Want?
  • Making a Daily Examen
  • The Sacrifice of a Smile
  • Fighting Our Own Indifference
  • Presentation
  • Encouraging Conversion Stories in the Bible
  • The Importance of Spiritual Reading

Archive of Past Articles

Popular Tags

abortion Advent Blessed Virgin Mary Carmelite Catholic Church children conversion Eucharist Faith family featured God God's Love Gospel grace holiness Holy Spirit human dignity humility Jesus Christ joy Lent love Marriage Mercy peace Pope Benedict XVI Pope Francis prayer prayer life pro-life Psalms sacrifice Saint John Paul II Saints Salvation Scripture sin spiritual life St. John the Evangelist St. Luke the Evangelist St. Matthew St. Paul surrender Truth

Catholic Links

  • Daily Scripture Readings for Holy Mass
  • Holy Mass – USCB Resources
  • Liturgy of the Hours from DivineOffice.org
  • Sacred Scripture – New American Version
  • Searchable Catechism of the Catholic Church
© Integrated Catholic Life™. Premium WordPress Theme.