by Deacon Michael Bickerstaff | February 17, 2012 12:01 am
By now, most every Catholic and non-Catholic citizen is aware of the important debate taking place over President Obama’s effort to force Catholic organizations and institutions to provide sterilization coverage and contraceptive coverage, including abortion-inducing drugs, in the health insurance plans they offer their employees.
The negative reaction to this mandate crosses lines of religion, age and sex. Many Catholics with whom I have spoken are upset, as are people of other faiths, Christian and non-Christian alike. While many of these people are opposed to contraceptives, I daresay that many others are not opposed to contraception, but are mightily opposed to the government mandating that people must violate their consciences.
One thing is certain; we must become educated about this issue and take steps to oppose the mandate. Many I have spoken to want to know what they can do, where they can learn more. There are still many people who do not have a clear understanding of the problem. I hope this article helps build awareness, knowledge and engagement.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”, also referred to by the media as “Obamacare”) was passed by the U.S. Congress and signed into law by President Obama on March 23, 2010. As with all laws, Federal Regulations are developed to define how to comply with the law.
On August 1, 2011, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued a “final interim rule” (the “HHS Mandate”) that would require almost all private health care plans to provide their members, at no out of pocket cost to the insured, access to female sterilization procedures and contraceptive prescription drugs, including abortion-inducing drugs. A very narrow “religious exemption” was offered to religious employers who hire members of their own faith, serve only members of their own faith, and whose mission is to inculcate that faith. This exemption would not cover religious schools, hospitals, charities and other such groups. It would not cover health insurance providers or any other private employer… or even private individuals in the market for health insurance. In other words, the exemption would likely protect only small churches with minimal staffs and no outreach to members of other faiths. This regulation would require compliance effective August 1, 2013 for those religious-affiliated groups who object… one year later than the rest of the population… one additional year to figure out how to violate conscience.
It was hoped for by many who opposed this mandate as a matter of conscience that this “final interim rule” would be reworked or rescinded altogether in order to respect the private conscience of those who oppose such procedures and drugs.
On February 10, 2012, after seeing the firestorm of opposition the regulation generated among the Catholic and non-Catholic population alike, President Obama announced an “accommodation” that he said answered the objections of the Catholic Church. In reality, the accommodation (1) effectively expanded the mandate to include churches and (2) used accounting and administrative techniques to make it appear that the objecting churches and religious-affiliated organizations are not involved in offering or paying for the mandated services and procedures.
Bottom line… employees covered by these employers will have free access under this regulation to drugs and procedures that are opposed to life and the moral doctrines of these employers. And that access would be under the plan they are forced to offer. Semantics and accounting techniques might change perceptions but they do not change reality.
Of course there is another option, we are told… “Don’t offer your employees health coverage and pay onerous penalties instead.” It should be clear to all that neither of these options is morally acceptable.
Possibly lost in the reporting of this sad situation is the clear fact that it is not just churches and religious institutions, schools, hospitals and charities that are affected; the mandate also is imposed on the general public and all private employers.
Consider the owners and shareholders of companies who are affected. Many of these individuals are also opposed on moral grounds by their consciences to the idea of paying for and providing these drugs and procedures. What is their recourse? Can the state coerce them to commit what their consciences and churches believe to be sinful?
Also consider private individuals whose health insurance premiums will help fund contraceptives, abortion-inducing drugs and female sterilization for the purpose of preventing or ending human life; not for preventing or treating disease. Can the state coerce them to commit what their consciences and churches believe to be sinful?
The Catholic Church and other religious organizations are among the largest providers of charity, heath care and education in this country. Unless this mandate is rescinded or these groups choose civil disobedience, they will likely have to close their doors. Think about that – no more Catholic Charities… no more Catholic Relief Services… no more Catholic schools and hospitals… no more Catholic Adoption Services… no more Catholic nursing and assisted-living facilities. Is this what the government really wants? Instead of attacking these institutions, the government should be encouraging them.
Also lost in the debate is the moral truth and urgency of the Church’s teachings. God is the giver of life and the life he gives is his gift to both society and the person conceived; a human person with a God-given Dignity that must be respected for there to be justice in this world. The “product of pregnancy” is not a disease, but the very children who are to make up the next generation if they are allowed to live. To cooperate in the effort to prevent those lives from beginning or to end them once begun is a crime against that person, society and God.
If the God-given right to life is not urgently and courageously promoted and defended, our nation suffers and continues its downward spiral into immorality and decay.
If our right to live these beliefs without interference by the government is not promoted and defended, the only rights we will retain are those grudgingly allowed us by the government. The unalienable rights recognized by the U.S. Constitution will be effectively a lost piety of the past. Whether or not one is opposed morally to contraception does not matter for this last point. The President of a Baptist University asked today, “If the government can force Catholic monks to dispense birth control, what can’t the government do?”
So what can I do? Here are five things you can do now to help stop this mandate:
Into the deep…
Related Article – Eight Compelling Answers for Common Objections to the Catholic Position on the HHS Mandate
U.S. Bishops Action Alert on Conscience Protection (practical steps you can take)
Cardinal Urges Senate Support of ‘Respect for Rights of Conscience Act’
Preventive Services Backgrounder
Bishops Renew Call to Legislative Action on Religious Liberty
Six Things Everyone Should Know About The HHS Mandate
White House Misrepresents Its Own Contraceptive Mandate
U.S. Bishops Vow to Fight HHS Edict
Deacon Mike Bickerstaff, Editor-in-Chief for The Integrated Catholic Life™, is the Director of Adult Education and Evangelization at his parish and a deacon of the Roman Rite for the Archdiocese of Atlanta.
Please help us in our mission to assist readers to integrate their Catholic faith, family and work. Tell your family and friends about this article using both the Share and Recommend buttons below and via email. We value your comments and encourage you to leave your thoughts below. Thank you! – The Editors
Source URL: https://integratedcatholiclife.org/2012/02/deacon-bickerstaff-hhs-mandate-made-simple/
Copyright ©2021 Integrated Catholic Life™ unless otherwise noted.