The Christian Worldview is Necessary for Science

World is Ordered

The development of science is one of the greatest modern testimonies to the axiom, “Truth cannot contradict truth.” A Christian worldview was, is, and always will be necessary for a proper study of the natural world, i.e. for science, to develop. Consider the following.

The Christian worldview is not based on blind faith, as if everything is immediately dependent on the will of God. We do not believe that God is a puppeteer determining every behavior and action in disconnected instances in time, creating scenarios as He goes. Such strict fideism ultimately assumes we cannot know with any certainty what the guiding hand will do next, not in nature or in anything else. This view denies that objects and beings have their own intrinsic natures influencing their behavior. This view is unbalanced; it over-emphasizes the freedom of God but denies His rationality. There could be no science in such a world.

The Christian worldview is not strictly deterministic, as if God created the world like He built a clock, wound it up, and ignored it to tick away time the way He intrinsically designed it to do. Nor does the Christian worldview oblige God to create a necessary world that has to be the way it is and no other way. Both views are also unbalanced and inimical to science. They over-emphasize the rationality of God but deny His freedom. There is no need for experimentation in a strictly determined, necessary world because if that were the case, we would be able to deduce the entire necessary physical system by pure thought.

The Christian worldview is not pantheistic, as if the universe emanates from God and runs on an eternal cosmic Ferris wheel, with all of us caught up hopelessly in whatever part of the cycle we happen to have been born on. In such a world, how can there be any desire for innovation or escape? Those despairing at the bottom of the cycle as well as those complacently soaring at the top cannot have the motivation or the confidence to learn and dominate the physical laws of nature.

Our Christian worldview is realistic, based on Divine Revelation, faith beyond reason, a certitude that martyrs die for rather than deny. Our Christian worldview is biblical. Our view holds that the world is created by the loving and merciful Creator, God the Almighty, and that He created the world with an absolute beginning in time that marches consistently to an absolute end of time. Our view informs us that Christ is the only-begotten Son of God and Savior of mankind, the Second Person of the Holy Trinity become man. Our view assures us that all creation is through Christ, the Word, the Logos, and is therefore rational, good, contingent, and orderly, made for us to know so that, in our corporeal existence founded on free will and guided by the light of the Holy Spirit, we can know God better through the testimony of His handiwork.

Why does this matter? Because we live in a scientific age confused by the errors of flawed worldviews. People deny Christianity but praise science as the path to all knowledge. People talk about ‘chance’ as if it were the ultimate causal event. People declare that a Christian cannot do science. The thing is, we need more faithful, realistic scientists with correct worldviews. And we need more people to defend the very obvious fact that science itself—born of a reconciliation with Christian theology—is fundamentally Christian because Christianity is necessary in the search for truth.

 

Recommended reading:

I highly recommend Theology and Modern Physics by Peter Hodgson (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2005). He explores these thoughts in Chapter 10, “Cosmology.” The late Dr. Hodgson (2008) was a friend and fan of the late Fr. Stanley Jaki (2009) and cited Fr. Jaki often. Dr. Hodgson served as a theoretical physicist at the University of Oxford from the age of 30 until his retirement and became the head of the Nuclear Physics Theoretical Group. He encouraged Catholic scientists to integrate their studies and belief and to publicize such syntheses, which I strive to do.


If you liked this article, please share it with your friends and family using both the Recommend and Social Media buttons below and via email. We value your comments and encourage you to leave your thoughts below. Thank you! – The Editors

Print this entry

About the Author

Stacy Trasancos is a wife and homeschooling mother of seven. She holds a PhD in Chemistry from Penn State University and a MA in Dogmatic Theology from Holy Apostles College and Seminary. She worked as a chemist for DuPont in the Lycra® and Teflon® businesses.

She teaches Chemistry and Physics for Kolbe Academy Online and Homeschool Program and serves as the Science Department Chair. She is teaching a set of summer mini-workshops titled "Science in the Light of Faith" for students, parents, other educators, or any Christian interested in the nuts and bolts of navigating science.

Similarly, she is teaching a "Reading Science in the Light of Faith" at Holy Apostles College & Seminary next Fall (2016). The course is funded by a John Templeton Foundation grant through John Carroll University for teaching science in seminaries. She is on the Board of Directors for ITEST (the Institute for the Theological Encounter with Science and Technology) where the essays from the course will be shared with the public.

Also in the Fall of 2016, she will teach a "Theological History of Science" course at Seton Hall University, where her mentor, the late Fr. Stanley L. Jaki was a distinguished professor. She is the author of Science Was Born of Christianity: The Teaching of Fr. Stanley L. Jaki.

Her new book, Particles of Faith: A Catholic Guide to Navigating Science is forthcoming with Ave Maria Press...

She teaches, researches, and writes from her family's 100-year old restored mountain lodge in the Adirondack mountains, where her husband and children (and two German Shepherds) remain her favorite priorities. Here is her website.

Author Archive Page

14 Comments

    1. Precisely CMINCA, Christianity is the prodegy of Judaism. Jews believe(d) in a rational God. They believed in an objective and rational Truth. God reveal to all mankind that he is The Truth. Hence Christians/Jews were, are, and never will be afraid to search for God through Science, as it only can reveal more truth about God. Unfortunately, in a rebellion to the sexual morality of Judeo/Christian culture, Scientists have been misinterpreting data, and misusing the scientific method, to justify a non-belief in a Judeo/Christian God, mostly his sexual morality, in order to avoid guilt for their actions. Does that apply to you? probably.

      1. So. If I reject the premise of this post, it is because I don’t want a god who will oversee and condemn certain sex acts that I might perform by myself or with other men? That is why it is so important that I prove that the Christian god does not exist?

      2. Stacy was not speaking of a “judeo/Christian culture”–she said “The CHRISIAN worldview is necessary for science”.

        This is demonstrably false.

      1. It is when you are defining a “realistic and correct worldview” as having to be “Christian”. You are stating that it is impossible for anyone of another religion to have a “realistic and correct worldview”.

        That is an opinion. That is a bias. That is NOT a statement of fact.

  1. Please do away with the Facebook, Twitter graphic on the side of the page. It is distracting and blocks the text in a manner which forces me, and probably other people, to go to another website. Thank you.

    1. Hi Chip,

      Thanks very much for the feedback. I strongly dislike social media buttons covering up text too.

      I have designed the layout so that the social media buttons are only intended to appear on the left side of the page if there is sufficient room on your screen for them not to obscure text. If there is not room, they should appear as a “share” bar at the bottom of the page instead. The site is designed to be “responsive” to screen size. That is what I see when I view the posts with my tablets and smart phones.

      Could you tell me what device you use to visit ICL. That will help me correct the problem.

      Again, I really do appreciate your feedback. – Deacon Mike

  2. Why must it be either/or? Why not that wonderful Catholic both/and?

    It’s not “either Christianity is necessary for science or Christians can’t do science.” Saying Christianity is necessary for science risks easy misunderstanding: you must accept Christianity in order to do science well.

    This would be as asinine and blatantly obviously false as the atheist claim that Christians can’t do science well.

  3. Have never encountered a scientific explanation for the origin of the universe, or the arrival of life therein, that I thought was well-considered. Other than those two trifles, I love science nearly as much as I love the Church!

    1. I think science has a long way to go before it can adequately explain the origin of this amazingly fine tuned universe, life and consciousness. Religion can claim to have the answers for these, but eventually science will come up with the real truth that will have nothing to do with religious explanations.

  4. The article sets a goal of sorts… but then collapses and does not offer a rational or faithful solution or presentation. It seemed to say, “I really want it to be this way… but, but, but I can’t come up with a system or explanation that makes sense.”

    The primary error is in claiming Realism. This universe is not consistent with Realism. Our faith is not consistent with Realism. There is only one philosophy that is consistent with faith and with science and with all observation – Idealism. Bishop Berkeley offered an introduction in A Treatise on Human Thought in 1710. It picks up where Plato left off.

  5. Despite the efforts of Steven Hawking and other atheists, those who deny God’s existence cannot arrive at a sound explanation for the first moment of our universe, some 13+ Billion years ago, as an incredibly massive point at an incredibly high temperature. The believer in a Judeo-Christian God can comfortably quote Genesis: And God said, “Let there be light!” And there was light.
    Granted, Genesis was not written to give a scientific explanation for anything; but human dependence on God is rational.
    TeaPot562

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *