Brother Guy Consolmagno: Carl Sagan Medal Winner and Role Model

BrGuyVisuale ESA-Valentini

The American Astronomical Society (AAS) Division for Planetary Sciences announced this month that Jesuit Brother Guy Consolmagno has won the Carl Sagan Medal for outstanding communication about planetary science to the general public. Brother Consolmagno is an astronomer and meteorite expert at the Vatican Observatory. He also serves as their Coordinator for Public Relations. The AAS commended Brother Consolmagno for occupying a “unique position” among astronomers as a “credible spokesperson for scientific honesty within the context of religious belief.”

Did you get that? A Jesuit Brother from the Vatican Observatory won the Carl Sagan Medal. A lot of people would say, “Wow, he’s living proof that science and faith do not conflict.” He is, of course, but look closer. Brother Consolmagno won the award for his scientific achievements and for his ability to communicate. He is a role model for effective evangelization in this modern scientific age.

His approach is to show how he personally lives and works as a scientist who has faith, and his book Brother Astronomer: Adventures of a Vatican Scientist describes his experience working with other faithful scientists. Scientists, by nature, are not discouraged by incomplete answers, but are driven to search for better answers even if they may never have the complete answer. Scientists are not afraid of mystery. For the faithful, science is actually a form of worship, a way to know the Creator better.

In God’s Mechanics: How Scientists and Engineers Make Sense of Religion, Brother Consolmagno develops a point that bears highlighting here. “Techies,” as he calls the technically-minded, want things to make sense. Even if people are not trained scientists, I think this mindset applies to anyone who has grown up in a technological culture and views questions through a technological lens. A young person, for instance, may not be so much interested in the medieval proofs of God as he is interested in knowing how faith will work in his life. There is a difference, Brother Consolmagno says, between the medieval proofs of God and how technically-minded think of proof. Proof, for them, needs evidence. Faith needs to be proposed in a more nuts and bolts, how-to-live-it kind of way.

Furthermore—an often forgotten point—every logical proof starts with axioms. That is, “belief comes before the explanations.” A faithful scientist views science axiomatically as the handiwork of God. He wrote, “In essence, it is not God that you find at the end of your logic; rather, your God is the unshakable axiom that you used when you started your chain of logic.” Thus to a techie, a proof of God’s existence may not prove anything, or it may sound circular. A techie isn’t looking for proof really; he’s looking for confidence. And he (or she) needs to be given space to figure out how faith is going to work. Techies don’t like proselytizing.

This approach to communication is one to emulate. This prestigious Carl Sagan Medal is, well, it is proof that such an approach works. Thank you Brother Guy Consolmagno for your example and leadership.

References and Further Reading:

Image credit: Brother Consolmagno kindly gave me permission to use this photo.


If you liked this article, please share it with your friends and family using the Recommend and Social Media buttons below and via email. We value your comments and encourage you to leave your thoughts below. Thank you! – The Editors

Print this entry

8 Comments

  1. What a curious article. It’s hard to believe that our current scientific societies—which are dominated by atheists—would award a scientist who gave a full-throated defense of a Christian world view. Carl Sagan himself was a self-described agnostic, with pantheistic leanings. His views toward Christianity were an admixture of skepticism and caricature. As a student of the history of astronomy and Church history, I was routinely disgusted with his depictions of Church/Science history. Sagan led the way in the popular mind in establishing the premise that true science was impeded by the Catholic Church.

  2. Brother Guy has also been a voice of reason wrt to many sects that adhere to sola scripture.
    “Religion needs science to keep it away from superstition and keep it close to reality, to protect it from creationism, which at the end of the day is a kind of paganism – it’s turning God into a nature god.”

  3. Nostrum, I have never understood what is wrong with creationism. “A kind of paganism?” What do you mean by that? Does my being against macro-evolution and my Faith that Adam was created directly by God as an adult make me a “creationist” in the sense that you find kind of “paganistic?” I think I am missing something here. Brother Guy does not seem reasonable when he argues that there could be intelligent life on other planets, since there is not a scintilla of evidence for that. I assume he is arguing from “probability” in that the universe is so immense, ergo etc. etc. Kind of like the evolutionist nonsense that holds that when we give matter millions (billions?) of “years” then anything can happen, even the order of an eyeball out of chaos. That does not seem scientific, probabilities are not based on scientific fact.

Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *